Find a Lawyer

SYED GHULAM HYDER SHAH ALIAS UMAZ SHAH versus MST. BIBI AMIRUNNISSA

Sections 39 and 42 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 215 Prosecution The sale of property by his lawyer to the sale of the property by law and legal proceedings to uphold such challenge Such sale, but not his legal heirs If the principal's legal heirs think that the lawyer deprived his father of his property because he was a person of unfounded mind, he or any of them Could file a lawsuit under it. His next friend for sale is legal cancellation

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• AYAZ v. State 2011 PCrLJ 177
• MUHAMMAD MASOOD BUTT v. S.M. CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. 2011 PLD 177
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Services, General Administration and Coordination Departm 2011 PLC(CS) 181
• UMAIR AHMED v. MUHAMMAD JAMEEL 2011 YLR 182
• CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through its District Coordination Officer v. Mrs. YASMIN 2011 CLC 183
• LALU alias BADARUDDIN v. State 2011 MLD 186
• NAEEM-UR-REHMAN KHAN NIAZI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 187
• UBEDULLAH v. State 2011 YLR 188

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

patent advocate from Nilore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes