Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c) Possession of drug bail, under further sanction of investigation, some private persons must also be included as witnesses. ? The accused suspect was not arrested on the spot and consequently no private person arrested on the statement of the participant accused was involved in witnessing the arrest of the accused, the prosecution case became suspicious Section 497 against the accused Did not fall under the prohibited clause. 1), the CRPC criminal suspect needs further investigation within the meaning of section 497 (2), CCP Bell is allowed to be the accused under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• YAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1838
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. SIR JAHANGIR KOTHARI TRUST 2011 CLC 1847
• Dr. SHAHZAD ALAM v. BEACON LIGHT ACADEMY 2011 CLC 1866
• KSB PUMPS COMPANY LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 MLD 1876
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE alias SAATHI M. ISHAQUE v. VICE-CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI 2011 YLR 1891
• PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD through Manager, National Stadium, Karachi v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL EXCISE AND TAXATION 2011 CLC 1894
• TAHA COMMODITY EXPORT v. KHADIM ALI SHAH BUKHARI (KASB), Bank Ltd. 2011 MLD 1898
• Mst. PARVEEN AKHTAR v. State 2011 YLR 1899

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

us immigration advocates from Bhuawana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes