Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus STATE

Section 13 (d) definition of unlicensed arms had the effect of allegedly recovering weapons in the presence of the advisers, who denied the suspects in the case and the criminal property seed advisers were subpoenaed and inspected. Done, but to no avail. As such an exercise failed to refute their statement, the other two witnesses admitted not to seal the recovered arms, resulting in a compromise between the parties under Section 34545, which resulted in the central case being acquitted. , The PC State Council did not oppose the grant's appeal appeal decision, was put aside in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• STIEFEL LABORATORIES PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND GLAXO SMITHKLINE PAKISTAN LIMITED 2011 CLD 1216
• SALAM alias ASLAM v. State 2011 YLR 1220
• GHULAM SARWAR v. MUKHTIARKAR (REVENUE) TALUKA QASIMABAD, HYDERABAD 2011 CLD 1221
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS LTD. 2011 CLC 1225
• KHALID MEHMOOD MALIK v. State 2011 YLR 1226
• AZHAR AHSAN THANVI v. State 2011 YLR 1230
• FAZAL MUHAMMAD v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION BABERLOI, DISTRICT KHAIRPUR 2011 MLD 1232
• NASIR ABBAS SOOMRO v. State 2011 YLR 1236

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

tax advocates from Hafizabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes