Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus STATE


The existence of a counter-version of the case for the existence of sections 7497 and ail 498 bail, as recorded by one of the accused in the F1R, does not affect the discretion used by the High Court based on the material on record. Is used by the lower courts on the basis of clear judicial principles. Otherwise invalid, please leave to appeal the Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 307/149

1975 S C M R 391

Present: Salahuddin Ahmed, Anwarul Haq and

Muhammad Afzal Cheema, JJ

MUHAMMAD USMAN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 7‑R of 1975, decided on 14th March 1975.

(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, dated the 27th of January 1975, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 162‑B of 1975).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑ Ss. 497 & 498‑Bail‑Mere existence of counter version of case as indicated in F. 1. R. lodged by one of accused‑Does not affect discretion exercised by High Court on basis of materials on record Discretion exercised by lower Court based on sound judicial' principles and not otherwise faulty, leave to appeal refused‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307/149.

Zafar Mahmood. Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmed Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Rlaz Ahmad, Additional Advocate‑General Punjab instructed by Ijaz Ali., Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.

Date of hearing : 14th March 1975.

ORDER

SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J.‑

The petitioners have been aggrieved by,‑;he order of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court refusing to grant bail to them in ‑a case registered against them under sections 148, 325, 307/149 of the Pakistan Penal Code on the 12th of October, 1974.

The allegations against the petitioners are that they fired at and Injured complainant Azizur Rahman with pistol shots. The complainant sustained three fire‑arm injuries.

The discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge is based on sound, judicial principle, and no fault can be found with it.

Merely because there was a counter version of the occurrence in the first information report lodged by one of the accused, Mohammad Afzal, does not in our opinion affect the discretion exercised by the learned Judge on the basis of the materials on record of the present case.

We accordingly dismiss the petition.

Petition dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Karore Lalisan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.