SYED SOHAIL HASSAN versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL
Section 497 Pakistan International Airline Corporation Act (XIX of 1956), Sections 3 and 6 of the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 18 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 In the Constitution Petition and Deception Commission, NAB's counsel denied. It was requested that Rs 195 million was pending against the applicant / accused, his checks were dishonored and he had committed fraud and fraud with Pakistan International Airlines Corporation, PIA Corporation was a legal Is an entity and its affairs are indirectly controlled by the Federal Government National Defense Division. The Accountability Bureau, under the circumstances, had the jurisdiction to investigate the Complaint of the Corporation Convention of Counsel that the NAB authorities had no jurisdiction to investigate the matter as the PIA Corporation was not a legal entity. Was done, in this case the applicants / accused were to be argued. That he had committed a partner in the slightest, he was also repelled because he admitted that he had made a default by deliberately and not intentionally paying the PIA corporation. , Since 2007, the applicant had intentionally defaulted, his application was dismissed, in the circumstances and his bail was rejected
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
