Testimonials of narcotics and narcotic drug trafficking and smuggling, reduction of criminals who were on the bus were asked to stop the bus, but instead of stopping, it increased speed and opportunity. Attempted to escape. And to improve his escape, he hit the motorcycle and injured the motorcycle rider. Defending the fact that the accused did not produce any convincing material on how it is possible that he did not know about the hashish on the bus, he was driving and cannot be believed that the driver could not be convicted There was no information or information about the contents and articles that were transported by him or were on the bus, which he was prosecuting against the accused, evidence of which Based on the investigation, which was supported. Reasons placed on record No evidence was produced by the accused for fabricating false evidence and considering the evidence, evidence was recovered in front of the driver's occupied vehicle pres. He is in control and in his knowledge if this drug was made safe. From the possession of the accused, then it was generally believed that he had a direct relationship with the drug. And the burden of this was that he had a lot of knowledge that the prosecution was able to bring the matter home as far as the role of the accused (driver) was concerned, in the present case, 260kg cross Of these, only 1200 grams were sent for chemical examination. No samples were taken from the packets
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
