Sections 12 (2) and XX, R 13 In the case of an administration, the auctioneer of the executory of the decree auctioning the auction price by the auction buyer and executing the sale in favor of it Section 14 (2) CP Under C, the plaintiff's (other legal heirs) order to revoke the injunction was concealed in October by the legal heirs of the deceased owner, without making him a party. And that it is willing to pay more than 10% of the auctioned property auction price, the trial court suspended the injunction process and instructed the plaintiffs to enter the amended title of the case, including the applicant's name. And instructed Nazir to return the auction money to the auctioneer's buyer. The auction buyer, at such a desolate stage, was not liable for deprivation of property purchased at the auction; the legitimate applicant, despite claiming to be the legal heir of the deceased owner, had filed a complaint in his name. Source party was not created. Its title, which was the result of plaintiff's misrepresentation of the act, was not given to the applicant for this notice, and was not heard from the applicant away from the case, causing him to appear before the required party. The applicant was deprived of his legal share in the auctioned property. The High Court instructed Nazir to give his new bids to the applicants and auction buyers and provide property to everyone. The beta offers the most and the auction buyer fails to meet the applicant's offer
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
