TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus UNIVERSAL NAVIGATION (PTE.) LTD.
Section 34 Costs for cost and cost of interest / markup / damages / Compensation Purchase agreement between one of five defendants containing the plaintiff's clause, being the party to the purchase of a competing contract. While retaining the petition, the plaintiff prayed for judgment and, jointly and several plaintiffs against all the defendants, showed that the defendant was his agent through the other defendants. Karachi port was conveyed, due to the loss suffered by the plaintiff due to the disappearance and commission of all the defendants. Yes, that was subject to the freight agreement and the provisions. The law was binding and the proper handling of the imported goods by the plaintiff's evidence relating to the alleged damages was available in Karachi, where the entire contract was made except for one contract; not all the defendants were signed to purchase the contract in Karachi. Competition will be a matter for the defendants. For them it would not be in the interest of justice to combine simple suit or division matters into two acts. Such an application was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
