Find a Lawyer

NIB BANK LTD. versus APPOLO TEXTILE MILLS LTD.

Sections 9 and 10 apply for suit loan documents to recover loan amounts and defend defendants' repayment of payments does not raise any substantive question of fact or law in such application. Validati Bank had already waived the waiver and other interest and only claimed to be recoverable under the terms of the loan agreement, its implementation was not ruled out. Admission status for which the High Court, in prayer, dismissed the leave application and dismissed the decree

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• SOOMAR v. State 2011 YLR 1682
• RAMZAN ALI HEMANI v. THE STATE through Director-General (NAB) 2011 PCrLJ 1690
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. State 2011 YLR 1697
• ARBAB v. State 2011 YLR 1699
• WASIF ELLAHI v. State 2011 YLR 1708
• SAJJAD GONDAL v. ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LIMITED 2011 CLD 1711
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL alias CAPTAIN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1714
• MY BANK LIMITED v. MUSLIM COTTON MILLS (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 1721

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes