Find a Lawyer

NASIR ALI versus UMAR DRAZ

Section 115 Review Request Objection raised by the Office of the High Court that the time of review is prohibited by the applicant confirming the removal of such objection within the prescribed time from such objection to the applicant. In the event of non-communication, the period will be considered as the last date of the petitioner's knowledge or his advice to the law was that when the matter is stopped only if the nature of the objection is such, then it will be considered only by the parties themselves. Can only be deleted by group. It was not intended to stop the proceedings over time as such objection by the parties to the law was not complied with. A narrow review request, if filed within the stipulated time limit, cannot be later dismissed on the basis that such an objection was neither removed nor the office's Out of source duration

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• SHER MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 YLR 595
• GUL NAWAZ v. State 2011 YLR 597
• IRFAN AHMAD v. S.H.O. 2011 PCrLJ 597
• Mst. NAHEED BASHIR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA 2011 MLD 599
• IRFAN HAIDER v. State 2011 PCrLJ 604
• ASIA KANWAL v. VICE-CHANCELLOR, EAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2011 YLR 604
• SAHIBA DOST v. CHAIRMAN ADMISSION BOARD/VICE-CHANCELLOR, UHS, LAHORE 2011 PLD 605
• IMRAN AHMAD KHILJI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 608

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Garh Maharaja lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes