Find a Lawyer

MST. SADIA SULTAN versus D.E.O.

Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Civil Service Petitioner challenged the withdrawal of his appointment order as an Elementary School Educator on the basis that neither the applicant was issued nor provided a hearing. Has not been declared as "serious". The argument is that according to the recruitment policy, the MA (education) qualification was a professional qualification and the applicant was not entitled to give the additional number of MA (education) qualification, it was a cognitive error that was corrected. Was. Not a professional degree, it was an arts degree in education. No allegation was made against the applicant nor was there any fault on the part of the applicant as it would be in violation of the principles of natural justice to manipulate the extra numbers of his appointment letter when he got his right. Was. The High Court allowed the constitutional petition to be withdrawn or withdrawn by the department without fulfilling the requirements of the principles of natural justice.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• WALI DAD KHAN v. State 2011 PLD 153
• Mst. SHAHIDA ANWAR v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS 2011 PTD 155
• MUHAMMAD JAVAID v. FALAK SHER 2011 PLD 156
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through S.V.P. SAMG (North) v. TAJ TEXTILE MILLS LTD. through Chief Executive 2011 CLD 157
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ MALIK v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 PLD 160
• ZAFAR ALI v. WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN) 2011 CLC 161
• AHMAD KAMAL NASIR v. CANTONMENT BOARD, RAWALPINDI 2011 PLD 165
• SHAFAQAT ALI v. State 2011 YLR 165

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

divorce advocates from Vehari lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes