Section 302 (b) Nature appreciated the evidence with which the FIR was lodged, not only eliminated the possibility of counseling, but also the two witnesses who were trapped, though the victim's real brother, but someone Hostility or contempt could not be detected. Which can encourage real brothers to substitute real criminals with the accused whose accuracy was given by the prosecution's witnesses with an ocular account, such as the manner of the incident; the time calculation between the incident and the FIR The book was, it cannot be believed that the event was anonymous. Or it could be assumed that the blood relationship was found to be too permanent to include the perpetrators in the FIR ocular account immediately lodged by both witnesses, even the name of the assailants. The manner of their arrival; the conflict resulted in the death of the deceased and their role, both witnesses were stuck together in every detail of the incident. And despite lengthy investigations, the defense has not been able to shake these witnesses in material aspects, which can be termed a "contradiction" that affects much of the evidence of these witnesses. Which were neither material nor seriously affected. The prosecution's case, it cannot be termed "contradiction", witnesses not only supported each other in connection with the incident, but the role each offender played was the difference between the place of injury, Could not go To deny the evidence of testimony, nor to make such variations can be legally accepted as contradictory as
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
