Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365B / 376 Abduction and Guarantee of Abuse, the FIR was not named in the accused's grant. Divorce marries and demands the protection of the law to live with it. His wife also filed a restitution of marital rights to allow the kidnapper to remain as his wife; on the other hand, on the statements of the alleged kidnappers under Sections 161 and 164, the accused involved in the crime. The included CRPCs were not. With the help of its medico legal report prima facie, the suspect's case needs further investigation within the meaning of section 497 (2);

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• AMEER HUSSAIN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1004
• RAZIA BIBI v. State 2011 YLR 1008
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. T.M.A. 2011 YLR 1011
• RASHEED AHMAD KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE LAYYAH 2011 MLD 1012
• Malik NAZEER HUSSAIN v. SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE 2011 YLR 1021
• MIRZA IRFAN v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 2011 MLD 1024
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2011 YLR 1025
• ASIF RIZWAN v. State 2011 YLR 1031

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Mian Chunnu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes