Find a Lawyer

ALI ANWAR RUK versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU

Section 497 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 9 (b) Constitutional Application Constitutional application was charged with delay in litigation proceedings remained behind bars for 18 months in which case the delay was a failure or Was not due to interruption. Only 5 of the 27 witnesses, part of the accused or his lawyer, were examined, so a trial was unlikely in the near future. The purpose of the trial was to face the accused and convict the inmate. Was accused of not giving up. The accused has been granted bail for speedy access to justice, including the right to a fair and speedy trial without delay.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015

• PROVINCE OF SINDH, SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REV) 2015 YLR 209
• Rao MUHAMMAD SHAKIR v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Government of Sindh 2015 PLD 213
• MUSARRATULLAH SIDDIQUI v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2015 CLC 214
• SHARAFAT v. UMER HAYAT 2015 MLD 216
• AHMED PAREKH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and Secretary, Home Department 2015 PLD 221
• Master GUL HASSAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary 2015 PLD 226
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR HOOKMANI v. FAYSAL BANK LIMITED 2015 CLD 227
• Syed ALI ATHAR v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT through District Coordination Officer 2015 PLD 231

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2015 →

famous high court advocate from Lower Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes