Section 12 Oaths Act (X of 1873), Section 10 Law Conduct (10 of 1984), Article 163 Proof of Contract for Sale of Proof, Article 163 of Canaan Evidence Appealed Before the Appeal of the Lower Appeal During the hearing, the plaintiff offered the defendant an oath on the Koran, which resulted in his dismissal of the appeal filed by the plaintiff; the application submitted by the plaintiff was that the law , Article 163 of 1984 was not complied with. At the time of the Court of Appeal's decision, when any person offered to make a sworn statement to the other party, such an offer was not under Article 163 of the Constitution, but rather under the Oaths Act 1873. If the offer is accepted, the person making the offer cannot refrain from it. The defendant himself offered that if the defendants swore to the Quran that he did not enter into a sale agreement, nor did he It has been considered that his appeal should still be dismissed because the plaintiff's offer was regularly accepted and the defendant made a similar statement on the Koran. When the plaintiff marked the thumb through it that he had heard the statement and in view of the statement, the plaintiff did not want to take legal action on the appeal and should also be dismissed and dismissed, which is why Plaintiff's appeal was dismissed by the lower appellate court. The High Court did not find anything illegal in the lower appellate court decision, therefore, the same situation was maintained
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
