Find a Lawyer

ROSHAN ALI versus MRS. PARVIN SALIM SHAH

A. XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract interim order, the parties' affirmations agreed to the terms and conditions of the contract which they were bound to sell. The agreement was accepted that the defendant, who refused to honor him due to delay in payment, could only settle the matter by adding evidence as the plaintiff had filed a case for defamation order. The need to respect the terms and conditions of the pass contract should be submitted to the claimant considering the sale of the court in the interim order given to the claimant The deeds are told that it is submitted to the court on the case of a fixed term in Middletown sale will be invested in some profitable scheme of government.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015

• MANZOOR CHACHAR v. State 2015 PCrLJ 690
• BANK ALFALAH LIMITED v. CALLMATE TELIPS TELECOM LTD. 2015 CLD 691
• SHAHID HUSSAIN v. PREM KUMAR 2015 YLR 691
• ABDUL AZIZ NAREJO v. KARACHI PORT TRUST 2015 PLC(CS) 699
• MUMTAZ ALI v. IQBAL AHMED 2015 MLD 701
• MUHAMMAD MEASUM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2015 PTD 702
• Agha Syed MUSHTAQUE ALI SHAH v. Mst. BIBI GUL JAN 2015 CLC 708
• ABDUL FATAH v. MAHARRAM ALI 2015 YLR 715

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2015 →

list of advocates from Ubaro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes