Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HARRY EDWARDS O\'NEIL versus THE STATE


Section 54, 55 and 56 read with criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), revision orders acting by the magistrate under section 435 and 439 of the Code of Conduct, 1898 despite the jurisdiction of the Sessions Judge and the High Court. Abk and the Sindh Abkari Act (V of 1878), Section 43 (3) of the Act V of 18 Sind78, section 43 (3).

P L D 1975 Karachi 54

Before Agha Ali Hyder, J

HARRY EDWARDS O'NEIL‑Applicant

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Revision Application No. 15 of 1974, decided on 5th April 1974.

(a) Sind Abkari Act (V of 1878)‑

Ss. 54, 55 & 56 read with Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 435 & 439‑Revision‑Orders passed by Magistrate functioning under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898‑Subject to revisional jurisdic tion of Sessions Judge and High Court notwithstanding orders having been passed under Ss. 54 & 55 of Act V of 1878‑Sind Abkari Act (V of 1878), S. 43(3).

Qazi Salim v. Manager, National Products Company and another P L D5 1970 Kar. 33 ref.

(b) Sind Abkari Act (V of 1878)‑

S. 54‑Confiscation‑plot obligatory but discretionary‑Magistrate finding offence technical in nature and nothing smacking of any nefarious purpose‑Accused, a foreigner, found carrying liquor in his car without paying excise duty and pleading absence of knowledge of excise duty‑Magistrate, held, erred in ordering confiscation of vehicle and, in lieu thereof, imposing penalty a foreign visitor could not arrange‑Mitigating‑circumstances like absence of knowledge and non‑complicity in commission of offence existing, Courts to exercise proper discretion.

Haji Abdul Razzak v. Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Finance,. Islamabad and others P L D 1974 S C 5 rel.

Rustom Kaikobad for Appellant.

Usman Ghani Rashid, A. A: G. for the State.

Attorney‑General on Notice from Court.

Date of hearing : 2nd April 1974.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Tarmatan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.