MOINUDDIN PARACHA versus NOVATRTIS PHARMA PAKISTAN LTD.
Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application Fair rent, Controller of terms rent increased monthly rent from Rs 63 to Rs 4 per square foot, which was maintained by the appellate court as a matter of fact. Kept Fair rent was the rent of the same premises or similar premises in the adjoining area. Increase in cost of construction and repair charges; if any property tax is levied after the commencement of the tenancy and after the annual cost of taxation, the implementation of the new tax, rent controller on Section 8 of the Renting Ordinance 1979 No restrictions or restrictions were imposed. The landlord was not obliged to prove the existence of all four conditions while dealing with the question of determining fair rent and was sufficient to increase the monthly rent of demolished premises under any conditions. ? By the start of the tenancy date, construction costs, property taxes, municipal charges and government taxes had increased manifold by 1 st 1967, and housing was located in the commercial area and business activity during the 47 years of the tenancy. There were. The value of the commercial premises and location of the damaged premises has been increased over time as the rent controller thoroughly investigated every aspect of the matter while making reasonable consideration to determine the rent. Judging by the question of Tefin, the same results recorded by the courts below were obtained. Only, appropriate and in accordance with the law, the constitutional application was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
