ABDUL RAZZAQ LASHARI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Sections 8484; And Bhutta was the applicant for the supply of electricity The company and the defendant faced legal action on the charge of stealing electricity, a case was registered against the complainant in 2009, which was dismissed on technical grounds, The respondent was displaying a grudge against the officials of the Electric Supply Company until the case against the defendant was registered. Year, 2013, there was not a single complaint made by him that officers of Electric Supply Company were demanding bribe / allowance or threatening to disconnect; the connection between the years 2009 and 2011 was disconnected and After the defendant sued the power supply company, the present case was problematic, as the officers of the Electric Supply Company were involved and made AC to perform their duties before the counter-terrorism court. It is serious for the High Court to refer the applicants to the trial court for treatment under section 249A or 265K, CR PC. Refused because it would not be able to secure the extremity of justice, but it was unlikely to be harsh. The FIR-based petitioner's conviction will result and the proceedings against him will be grossly outrageous. Under the High Court, the petition against the petitioners is pending.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
