Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL CHUNDRIGAR

Section 42, Specific Relief Act, 1877 Applicable Relief Act, Section 42 of 1877 will apply only in cases where the plaintiff claims to be entitled to a legal role or property right under which the claimant is denied. Was done. Plaintiffs could not apply in cases where Section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, denied the plaintiff's sole jurisdiction or legal role for the defendant's property, in which the plaintiff defended his right to court Had approached Or legal role for property but where it did not include their own legal role or property right then Section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 was not enforceable and the unrestricted right to declare all kinds of suit was not granted. Was and is limited.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015

• Hafiz MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Government 2015 MLD 1156
• SARDAR AHMED ABBASI v. MUHAMMAD ZAMAN ABBASI 2015 CLC 1157
• AMEER ALI v. KHUDA BUX 2015 CLD 1159
• NOVARTIS AG through Authorized Signatory v. NABIQASIM INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2015 CLD 1162
• COMBINE PRODUCTS v. SME LEASING LIMITED 2015 CLD 1188
• MUHAMMAD YOUNUS v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY 2015 CLC 1190
• Malik MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. Mrs. FARHAT IMRANA 2015 MLD 1191
• MUBASHIR PESH IMAM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2015 MLD 1197

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2015 →

female advocates from Haripur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes