Further investigation into the filing of a preliminary FIR with no explanation, Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392, 395 and 412 of robbery, robbery, fraudulently receiving stolen property I approve the delay of two months. In which the accused was not named, but was later introduced by the complainant's supplementary statement when the defendant subsequently appeared against the accused, without disclosing any information about the guilt of the prima facie. The recovery of the mobile phone was suspected as the alleged mobile phone brand was found to be different from the example of the accused mentioned in the FIR, Rs. 10,000 unaccounted cash collection, indefinite period. It was not enough to put them behind bars, only to determine the identity of these recoveries. This can be done by recording some evidence through the TT. The court proceedings in this case were of paramount importance to the identification parade because the complainant named the accused, the heir's details, without any significant progress in the trial of the accused long before the identification parade, after 4 2009 12 2009 Was behind bars and his further imprisonment in the prison would not serve any purpose, the defendant was further investigated in the trial against Prime Fascia and was convicted under Section 497 (2). The CCP suspect was released on bail, under conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
