To conclude the Section 13 case, the defendants contended that the case was a "sale" of immovable land and was not "interchangeable". The rial trial court allowed the case on appeal and the same was raised by the plaintiff. The dispute was decided. The original was a disguise transfer that was substantially established by the immediate sale made by the parties, as such a lack of consideration for the transfer would not affect the efficacy of corruption and corruption. Is practiced in the form of exchanges. It was clearly shown that in the end the transfer of the defendants was, in the end, properly transferable, and the exchange was made only as a bridge to prevent the parties from claiming premature conversion. And as a result of the controversial variations, the sale showed strong and unreliable fact that the sale was a decision-making sale by the appellate court just to avoid redemption, not based on wrong reading, reading, reading or assumptions. The High Court dismissed the request for review. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
