Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD GHAZI KHAN versus THE STATE


Applicant in the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 493 bail does not need further investigation and the suspect's signature has been sent to Judicial Lockup but the opinion expert is still available for comment. Can be sent, nevertheless, obtaining the approval of the litigation against the applicant, the public servant, within which time the challan should be presented in the court is not certain the applicant has, under the circumstances, the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/465/468/471 and Passport Act (Prevention of XXXIV, Section 3 of 19201). Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2)
1974 P Cr. L J 600

[Lahore]

Before Mazharul Haq, J

MUHAMMAD GHAZI KHAN‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4326/B of 1973, decided on 14th November 1973.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑‑S. 493‑Bail‑Accused petitioner no longer required for investiga tion and remanded to judicial lock up‑Accused's specimen signatures obtained but yet to be sent to Handwriting Expert for opinion‑Sanction for prosecution of petitioner, a public servant, yet to be obtained‑Time within which challan to be put up in Court not certain‑Accused petitioner granted bail in circumstances Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 420/465/468/471 and Passport Act (XXXIV of 19201, S. 3, Prevention of Corruption Act (11 of 194 7), S. 5(2).

Mian Nazir Akhtar for Petitioner.

Walayat Urnar for the State.

Noor Sultan, S. I., Special Police Establishment, Rawalpindi with Record.

ORDER

The allegations against the petitioner are that he used to issue bogus visas. On secret information, raid was arranged and the petitioner was apprehended red handed, when he fixed the seal of British Embassy on the passport of one Asghar Hussain in a hotel at Rawalpindi. A Rubber stamp (seal) of the British Embassy was recovered from his possession, which he is alleged to have got prepared from his co‑accused Muhammad Nasim Proprietor of Agerton Press, Rawalpindi. It is also alleged that the petitioner was previously employed in the office of the British High Commissioner and at the time of the raid, was Interpreter‑cum‑Translator in the National Assembly. The petitioner was arrested at the spot. Later, he applied for bail before the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner (General), Rawalpindi, who allowed him interim bail. The petition was thereafter finally disposed of by the learned Senior Special Judge (Sessions Judge), who dismissed it. The petitioner did not surrender to custody and applied for bail before arrest before this Court, which Petition was dismisses on 17th September, 1973. He was later arrested. An application foe bail was again made before the learned Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi, which was dismissed on 15th October, 1973, on the ground that his petition for bail had already been rejected.

2. Mr. Noor Sultan, Sub‑Inspector. Special Police Establishment, who is present with record, has stated that the petitioner has been sent to the Judicial lock‑up and is not required for the investigation of this case. He further stated that the specimen handwriting of the petitioner, which have been obtained, are to be sent to the handwriting expert for opinion, which will take some time. He also stated that sanction for the prosecution of the petitioner has yet to be obtained from the Central Government, without which, the challan cannot be put in Court. Since the investigating officer is unable to state as to how much time it will take to put in the challan in Court, which, of course, depends upon the completion of the examination of the specimen signatures and the sanction for the prosecution. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 20,003 (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfac tion of the Assistant Commissioner, Rawalpindi.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Gharo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.