Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed, while praising the evidence, alleged that he never accused a minority of minority during the investigation or trial under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance. The 2000 convictions charged by the accused were dismissed by any force. Both the victim and the accused are residents of the same area, the case was not misidentified, one of the prosecution witness was the real brother of the deceased and the other was from the same area, both said that the prosecution's witnesses have confirmed the prosecution's version. ? The complaint cannot be ruled out as being a resident of the same village and the probable cause of their occurrence at the location and location, the prosecution's witness described the incident according to the prosecutor's version, which is lengthy Can't be shattered despite scrutiny. Her relationship with Mary Factum, her real brother with the deceased, could not be presented to any of the suspected prosecution witnesses who was not accused of any previous animosity or personal enmity, but for a long time Despite the scrutiny, there is nothing wrong with the prosecution's prosecution. , Was a conviction of a fully credible weapon (knife), recovered at the suspect's notice, chemical examiner's reports confirmed it to be blood stains. The serologist's report was substantially linked to the commission of the crime through the prosecution medical evidence; it also provided substantial support to the prosecutor's version of Moto, as it was not alleged by the complainant.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
