MUHAMMAD MISKIN versus CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB
Article 16 and 19 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition The boundary of the invalid order The applicant was the tenant of the land which was resumed to its owner and handed over to the Government under the West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation, 1959. Gaya, Senior Member, Board of Revenue dismissed Applicants / Review Applicants canceled the land auction and in all subsequent mutations claimed that they had a legal right to resume land. Have received. After 56 years, litigation applications challenged the suit in connection with the suit, and the land reclaimed and subsequently auctioned and registrations in revenue were made. Record P in favor of most bidders, claiming that all land orders were void and no bounds were made against a false order. Misconduct was an illegal order but where such results resulted. Yes, the aggrieved party had to challenge the same constitutional petition without anyone being excluded on the grounds that it is a case of goodness. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
