Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus HAJI SOOMAR KHAN

Deciding whether to request a suspension of sentence under Section 426 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302 of the death penalty jurisdiction Rule 264, the PC court could not have given a deep appreciation of the evidence on the basis of which The death sentence was pronounced. The trial court could not be bothered with the evidence of the eyewitness testimony and unless the evidence of the case was disregarded on the record, the appellate court prosecuted for the purpose of deciding the application under section 262626, CRPC. Can temporarily examine the evidence of The request for either party was rejected due to prejudice

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015

• ALI MUHAMMAD v. Mst. SAEEDA 2015 YLR 1937
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION UMERKOT 2015 YLR 1949
• ABDUL RAZAQUE v. INVESTIGATING OFFICER OF CRIME NO.185 OF 2012, POLICE STATION KANDIARO 2015 YLR 1956
• MUHAMMAD v. State 2015 YLR 1969
• QURBAN v. State 2015 YLR 2018
• IZZAT KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary 2015 YLR 2024
• IMDAD v. State 2015 YLR 2036
• MUHAMMAD SAAD v. AMNA 2015 YLR 1

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2015 →

famous high court advocate from Abdul Hakim lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes