Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SYED HUSSAIN versus SYED MUHAMMAD HASSAN


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 The Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 34 was read with the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), mergers for Section O 18 period during which the applicant employed Not Acceptable Stable Order Not approved by the Labor Welfare Officer for the period for salaries and expenses of arrears during which the employee was unemployed and amended accordingly

1973 P L C 29(1)

[Baluchistan Labour Court]

Present: Abdul Qadeer, Chairman, Bilgrami and Irshad Rana, Members

SYED HUSSAIN

Versus

Syed MUHAMMAD HASSAN

Application No. 85 of 1972.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)

, S. 34 read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Stand ing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. O. .18‑‑‑Emoluments for period during which applicant employee remained jobless ‑ Not admissible‑Consolidated decree passed by Labour Welfare Officer for arrears of pay and emoluments for period during which employee remained jobless‑Amended accordingly.

ORDER

ABDUL QADEER (CHAIRMAN)

.‑The applicant has requested that the Labour Welfare Officer, Quetta, by his decision dated 10th of July 1971 awarded a decree of Rs. 1,070 against the respondent, but the respondent failed to pay the same and the matter was transferred to the Labour Director but the respondent did not appear before the Labour Director. Consequently he has moved this Court for the redress of his grievance. The papers from the Labour Director were also summoned. In his application the applicant has claimed the arrears of pay, amounting to Rs. 770 and 'Rs. 300 as emoluments for the period for which he remained without job. He is not entitled the second relief, but as the respondent is absent in spite of service we have no option but to accept the claim of the applicant with regard to the arrears of pay, we therefore allow Rs. 770 to the applicant and against the respondent.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Doltala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.