O IX, Rr 6 and 13 The preceding injunction, set aside by the plaintiff and failed to appear before the defendant when the case for a hearing was sought, O IX, R 6, the defendant under CPC's endorsement. A former party decree has been issued against Ali. It was proved that the summons was properly presented, the court can proceed on the previous matter and issue an order without recording any evidence. But if the summons was not properly presented, then the court will direct the issuance of the second summons and the submission of the law to the plaintiff, if all efforts for personal service have failed, then a replacement should be given. ? And after meeting the requirements of the law relating to the service of the summons, the court may pass the ex parte order. However, where appropriate service cannot be served, no order of the former party order can be granted against the defendant if the court is satisfied. That the summons was not properly presented and the defendant was withheld for any reasonable reason to appear when a case was sought for hearing, ordering the ex parte decree to be set aside So that nothing was available on record to prove the claimant's claim. The defendant was served reasonably, whatever was brought on the record was not enough to stop it, the defendant was properly served. And the former party decree was made in accordance with the lawful provisions of the law. Defendant identified certain conditions, whereby it was found that he was a former party decree approved against the defendant in violation of the law. Placed aside, put in the conditions and so on
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
