Plaintiffs' dismissal of the Articles 13 and 31 lawsuit for dismissal has provided ample evidence on the record that it claims that it has obtained information on the suit property sale transaction, Immediately, he announced his intentions in the same seat, so as to exercise his right of self-possession in advance. In connection with the said property and subsequently issued to the students in accordance with the law, it is a fact that the original notice was issued to a shopkeeper / defendant, while photostat copies were provided to the remaining persons, to deny their claim. Cannot be considered a good place for. The plaintiff, who was a co-defendant in the suit property Wandi / defendants, was the original brother and resided in the same house, issuing photostat copies of the notices, which did not affect his rights for 3 months and 10 months. Was filed later. A few days after the change was affirmed, the appellate court was below, the trial court's decision and order were properly withheld, Abbott was dismissed by the plaintiff, the suit was properly upheld by the appellate court. The decision was made, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
