MISS NADIA SIDDIQUE versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section 10 Punjab Government Service (Conduct) Rules, 1966, R12 Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 25 terminated the services of appellants without inquiry during their investigation period. went. This is because they delayed declaration of their assets and provided documentary proof of their assets. There is no allegation against the appellants that they hid their assets from the authority or delayed the declaration of the assets, or that the assets were beyond unknown sources of assets. The income that justifies the extreme course of termination of his services, he joined the appellant service after qualifying for a competitive examination, and after training with the Judicial Academy, performed his duties as a civil judge. Were giving. Appellants had no complaints of eligibility or eligibility or performance. The termination of the record on the record was a severe punishment, only because of the alleged negligence and the delay in submitting the declaration of their assets, the sentence should be mistaken. Or the Commission Authority issued appropriate warnings to the appellants for future caution. If it is a false declaration or gross mismanagement, to counter the sacred assignment of the administration of justice, then, it cannot be easy to eliminate it because it was bound to bring reproach. And in this case, the Authority should, through regular inquiry, give the appellants the right to a hearing and, consequently, take appropriate action. Two other civil judges also submitted late declarations of assets, but were not dismissed. And make them holy
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
