Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ADIL LATIF versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Examination of Development in the Department for Irrigation and Sub-Engineers conducted by the Department of Electricity, in which papers / queries of the candidates after continuing the selection process after such examination. The car is replaced. Employee appeals will be adversely affected by service tribunal verification. Such new standards laid down by the Department were not in violation of the PWD Code. Impeded notification did not affect the scheduled course of the examination did not prevent the PWD Code from changing the competent authority's standards. At no time was the allegation made against the suspended curriculum within the proposed curriculum design.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• Mst. NUSRAT v. Dr. Cap. SHAHZAD RIAZ 2011 SCMR 1325
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2011 SCMR 1327
• BASHIR AHMAD v. INCHARGE (FEMALE) DARULAMAN, DISTRICT MIANWALI 2011 SCMR 1329
• REHMATULLAH v. State 2011 SCMR 1332
• QAMAR ABBAS v. State 2011 SCMR 1335
• AMANULLAH SOOMRO v. P.I.A. through Managing Director/Chairman 2011 SCMR 1341
• Mrs. REHMAT JEHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2011 SCMR 1344
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. ALLIED BANK LIMITED 2011 SCMR 1347

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

famous supreme court advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes