Find a Lawyer

THE STATE THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ANTI NARCOTICS FORCE, RAWALPINDI versus QAISAR HAFEEZ

Section 497 (5) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Bail Bonds, the High Court's denial of bail granted the defendants right thereafter Further litigation is needed. After the trial court's investigation of six witnesses, the accused's inquiry was on its way to an end and it was not proper to dismiss his bail on a technical basis. The accused never misused the bail exception. And it faced trial proceedings based on proper definition of the material on record on bail and did not face any form of weakness or illegal interference under which the Supreme Court sought intervention of the petition. had gone.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• NASEER v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2011 SCMR 1430
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), MANDI BAHAUDDIN 2011 SCMR 1433
• ASHFAQ AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1435
• ABDUL MAJEED v. MANAGER, PIA, LAHORE 2011 SCMR 1436
• DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (MEE), BAHAWALNAGAR v. Mst. FOUZIA NAZIR 2011 SCMR 1441
• ZIA alias AHMI v. State 2011 SCMR 1444
• GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. PAK LTD. v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, KARACHI 2011 SCMR 1446
• RASHID AHMED v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GEPCO 2011 SCMR 1451

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes