PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ISLAMABAD
Sections 3, 4 and 51 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. XXXXX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), declarations and injunctions in suits 42 and 54 Sales tax grants on the plaintiffs were airlines that searched for aircraft based on a lease basis for the flight process. Authorities demanded that taxpayers generally leave their way through the law and its remedies. , To pay tax on a fixed time and then to demand a refund, if so, has arisen at the appropriate stage and from the relevant legal authority where the output tax is my The procedure for adjustment of intra-input tax is a fundamental feature of the law, the nature of the goods remains intact and the facts will make it clear that there is no definite tax liability. Emphasizing the adherence to a constructive method of useful purpose would insist on enriching the state and promoting poverty along with taxpayers, even if only temporarily could be regarded as unfair. It was a relief that the Constitution could not grant, but a court exercising equal jurisdiction could, of course, rely on the provision of Section 51 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, in which case the plaintiff was prosecuted. Was. The balance of the case and the facility was in their favor, and if the defendant's office initially appeared to be the case, the final tax liability was zero, the plaintiff's negligence would obviously be more inconvenient. That even if only temporarily, the defendants need to be treated in the same way that the plaintiffs suffered irreparable harm and injury
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
