Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL BRANCH versus ZIA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI

Section 10 Applicable to the service tribunal sentence under the Pakistan Red Crescent Society Act (XV of 1920), Section 4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appeal Maintenance Employees of the Pakistan Red Crescent Society in the service tribunal. According to the law and service tribunal referred to the correctness of the obligation to restore the job without deciding the litigation, the tribunal upheld the decision only because the Supreme Court decided the matter according to law. Had received his remand for and directed himself wrong in the decision on this question. The employee of the scope was not a public servant who could resolve his complaints by appeal before the service tribunal was allowed before the service tribunal's appeal to the service tribunal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SHAHID IMRAN v. State 2011 SCMR 1614
• DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, KASUR v. ZAHID ALI 2011 SCMR 1618
• SHAHID FAROOQ v. State 2011 SCMR 1619
• AL-RAHAM TRAVELS AND TOURS (PVT.) LTD. v. MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS, HAJJ, ZAKAT AND USHR 2011 SCMR 1621
• Syed ARSHAD ALI SHAH BUKHARI v. State 2011 SCMR 1644
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. State 2011 SCMR 1646
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. Mst. MARRIAM BIBI 2011 SCMR 1648
• Mst. FIRDOUS BATOOL v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER 2011 SCMR 1655

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Sakrand lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes