Section 41, Proviso Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12, 27 (b), Section 12, 27 (b), Article 185 (3) Considerable Buyer's Valid Consideration for Specific Performance, Declaration and Order For, the plaintiff's rule claimed ownership of the suit property on the basis of the sale agreement, formally acknowledged the sale settlement, public notice in the possession of the newspaper, payment of property tax and payment of utility bills, etc. ? The plaintiff opposed the case on the basis of the registered lease deed. In his favor, the suit was executed by the property owner's lawyer, which was in accordance with the plaintiff's validity six years before the seller's agreement, in section 41 of the Property Transfer Property Act, 1882 , Which protected the subsequent migration. It had to be established that he had acted with good faith before entering into a deal, and had taken reasonable precautions and had given valuable consideration to such an exchange. Was deducted from the fact that the facts should be clearly relied upon by the camels to prove that they were entitled to the benefit of section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. , Was always on the person who requested such protection. The plaintiff never requested that he waive any property between the owner and the defendant without reporting any previous transaction. Neither the buyer nor the plaintiff had presented any such evidence before the trial. If the claimant had inspected the relevant registrar, then the earlier lease between the owner and the defendant would have been implemented.
