Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus MANSOOR ARIF

SECTION 42 Declaration on the registered sales deed filed by his son for fraud in favor of the shopkeeper: Vendor's lawyer's hearing without disclosing the sale has been disclosed That the claimant had marked his thumb on the sale process. It was also read and the cost of the sale of the suit land by check and cash; that the plaintiff had admitted such facts before the sub-registrar in the presence of trivial witnesses. And after the seller took over it began construction on the suit land. Minor sales witness testimonials support the lawyer's sub-registrar's statement, as the testimony deposed that the defendant's thumb impression on the sale agreement was acknowledged in his presence upon receipt of the sale price. The bank's manager claimed that the barrier check in the name of the plaintiff was intended to sell the suit by his son the plaintiff, which is in evidence from the Patwari circle, which stated that the plaintiff sold the property in the presence of the property. Got a copy for The son and the shopkeeper; Evidence shows that the plaintiff was living in the same house with his son and Wendy successfully executed the sale and the payment of the sale price suit was inadmissible. \ R \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY v. UNIVERSITY OF SINDH 2011 SCMR 190
• ABDUL REHMAN v. Mst. SAHIB BIBI 2011 SCMR 191
• JUSTICES HASNAT AHMAD KHAN AND SYED SHABBAR RAZA RIZVI 2011 PLD 195
• Ms. SALMA MOOSAJEE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 196
• JUSTICES (R) IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN CHAUDHRY, KHURSHID ANWAR BINDER, HAMID ALI SHAH, ZAFAR IQBAL CHAUDHRY, 2011 PLD 197
• MUKHTAR AHMAD v. State 2011 SCMR 200
• MUHAMMAD WAQAS RAFI BHATTI v. MUHAMMAD SARMAD RAFI BHATTI 2011 SCMR 201
• ABDUL HANAN v. SAFDAR ALI 2011 SCMR 203

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

female advocates from Zahir Pir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes