DIRECTOR-GENERAL INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ISLAMABAD versus AMIR MUJAHID KHAN
Section 8 Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1973, R8B Civil Servant (Sanity) Rules, 1993, R3 Estacode Edition, 2000, SI Nos. 147 and 148 Seniority Department to promote direct appointments. On the basis of the charge, the development respondents temporarily faced a list of seniority / gradation list against which their departmental representations were dropped but the service tribunal allowed their appeals, with the respondents responding to the subsequent publicity. Having obtained its original sanity for so long, the order of the Promotion Committee of the Department continued in 18 18 2005, resulting in permanent gambling. Respondents were not developed, therefore, it is believed that they are considered due to lack of required length of service and have not been promoted, therefore, such respondents are partially advertised. Considering that from their first date, seniority cannot be granted. Appeals were accepted to the extent of the respondents who were not permanently promoted on the basis but they were appointed on a temporary charge basis and were rejected on the basis of the respondents who were on a permanent basis Appointment At a meeting held on January 18, 2005, the department's appointment was promoted within a year. Subsequently, in the year 2006, for those who were promoted to development, the Supreme Court refused to decide the issue of seniority of development benches because it was not an issue before the court, the suicide proceedings of such an interfaith case. I could not decide. Accordingly
