HAJI MUHAMMAD ILAHI versus MUHAMMAD ALTAF ALIAS TEDI
Articles 2/2/3034 evidence / 34 ? Re-conviction of evidence, conviction by the trial court amended to increase the death sentence, the High Court complainant confirmed the desire to increase the sentence or the sentence. The reversal case where it was up to you to find. In fact, such a fact would not be reversed unless the death sentence was increased unless others read false news or evidence was read or a particular point was misread. There was a misunderstanding of justice, usually there was no test of intervention. Determining whether justice was misunderstood would answer another question whether the lower court's view on the question of reduction of punishments was impossible because the High Court amended the sentences. I was not irrelevant and unreasonable in maximizing benefits The court observed that the authority to increase the death sentence should be exercised less by the Supreme Court and the sentences should be increased only in cases where there was no increase in punishment. There can be serious corruption of justice. The fact is that if the Supreme Court heard the case, it was possible that the increase in the death sentence was not enough reason to be guilty or convicted. The accused's appeal was dismissed
