Section 2 (b (b) / & F & 7 337F (ii) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 Qatil Amad) and the evidence thereby brought about the improvement of Badi Ahmed as answered under section 2342. I was given by the accused, the CCP was different, which was a clear change in the complainant's position, which identified the eyewitness accounts of the accused to the other eye witnesses attributed to the alleged injury. Chest injury to the abdomen is due to the co-accused, who was given a lower sentence by the High Court co-accused, leading to life-threatening fatal injury to the deceased chest. While the accused, who was supposed to cause injury to his abdomen, suffered extreme punishment, which was a contradictory situation, the co-accused was given less punishment, both were not punished. Was given, the accused and the co-accused were convicted and convicted, but the change came when the convicted person changed his position from the one given to the FIR and the testimony of the other witness was not contradictory. , The accused, did not deserve such death sentence. Under the leadership of the prosecution, the accused was sentenced to death, he was sentenced to life imprisonment, which would meet the conditions of justice.
