SYED MAJEEDULLAH I-IUSSAINI, CEO versus DIRECTOR (NBFCD), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Section 224 Moderba Companies and Moderba (Floating and Control) Ordinance (XXI of 1980), Section 11 and 32 Moderba Rules, 1981, and Rules for Moderba Rules, 1981, R10 Moderba, by Reglan 7 (3) Company Directors Upon inspecting the Company's annual audit account of the Company's associated yearly enforcement of fines, it has been observed that the Company has violated the provisions of the Regulations and Registrar has amended Section 32 of the Modarba Companies and Modarba Companies. Has issued show cause notice to the appellants. ) For failure to comply with the provisions of R10 of the Modarba Rules, 1980, each appellant was fined Rs. 5,000 for violation of the R10 of the Modarba Rules. And for appellant's objection, each appellant was fined Rs. 50,000 for violating Rule 7 (3) of Modarba's Prudential Regulations. \ The suggestion that the PREDNATIONAL REGULATION FOR MODERBA was not published. Yes, it has no basis because there are additional provisions for the Modarba ordinance to be floated in section 11 of the Modarbia Ordinance 1980 and they were not required to be published in the Official Gazette. Was introduced and the Moderba companies were widely spread. The fishing was done by the appellants and T1i in the respective companies, the politicians cannot be allowed to decide whether such a decision was made negligently, negligently, unwittingly or unwittingly admitting the registrar (Moderba). was done. , Withdrew the company's facilities with a soft view, c
Related judgments — Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, 2011
