MIAN SAIF-UR-RAHMAN versus MALIK IQBAL AHMAD LANGRIAL
Sections 52, 68, & 69 and Election 70 on the declaration of nomination of the returning candidate as invalid, the applicants / non-declared candidates had alleged in their election petition that the returning candidate was B. Has claimed to have a degree. The two education madrassas were not approved by the Higher Education Commission; the retired candidate submitted his papers nomination to contest the National Assembly by submitting documents claiming to hold the BA Educational Certificate, but before the Returning Officer. Documents made were forged. And the nominated candidate was declared empowered and fraudulent, the retired candidate from the Election Tribunal did not have any honorarium from the religious madrassas which was recognized by the Higher Education Commission from the religious madrassas as returning candidates. Claimed that he had faked and faked her through fraud. Returning candidate did not pass two additional articles in accordance with the law; in view of the fraudulent and fraudulent procedures by the returning candidate, he was not only unable to contest the election, On the contrary, he was not an honest or honest man or a rich man. The returning candidate was declared illegal and invalid. Accordingly, the notification for his retirement was set aside and it was ordered to cancel that no applicant / non-candidate could not be declared a successful candidate because of the large number of votes. H
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2012
