Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ & SONS KOHAT, PESHAWAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Complaints of section 114 (2), 9 and 10 (4) of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000V of XXXV) for failing to decide on a defamation petition by the Department Was gone The complainant could not find the user ID, password and zip code of the EFBR portal which was delayed by the department for about six to six years to decide the complainant's request. This was the equivalent of serious misconduct in terms of section (of) the establishment of the office. To decide on the complainant's request for a waiver of penalties for not submitting an Income Tax Statement for 2011 - and the circumstances of the case. Keeping up to date - Annual details of all pending registration cases across Pakistan; and reporting compliance within 30 days. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012

• WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 554
• MUSSADAQ FARHAN CHUGHTAI through Muhammad Ibrahim Chughtai v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 565
• COMPLAINANT v. HAQ NAWAZ 2012 PTD 751
• E.M. INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 836
• ARIF IQBAL v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1193
• SHAHZAD ANWAR SHEIKH v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1265
• SHOAIB AHMAD, MUHAMMAD ALI COTTON WASTE FACTORY, FAISALABAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1343
• Sheikh M. SULTAN AHMED MUALLA RULER IN ABU DHABI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1365

All Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan judgments of 2012 →

best law firms from Tando Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes