Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SH. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND 5 OTHERS versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Pre-arrest Section 498 Bail Pre-arrest Request For bail, in the first instance, any such application filed directly in the High Court should be presented to a Sessions Judge and no such Not necessarily the reason that does not come to the sessions court for the first time. Under the circumstances, excluded

1971 P Cr. L J 1117

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Farukee, J

Sh. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND 5 OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 733/B of 1971, decided on 26th March 1971.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)----

---

S. 498‑‑Bail before arrest Petition for bail before arrest must, in first instance, be presented to Sessions Judge‑Such petition filed in High Court direct and no compelling reasons shown fur not approaching Sessions Court in first instance‑Petition, in circumstances, dismissed.

Nasir‑ud‑Din Shah and another v. The State P.L D 196 Lah. 516 Riaz Ahmad v. Toba Tek Singh Co‑operative Mortgag Bank 1968 P Cr. L J 1940 (1) and Muhammad Nawaz v. The Stat Cr. Misc. No. 8116 of 1970 Tel.

Wasim Sajjad for Petitioners.

ORDER

This is a petition under section 498, Cr. P. C. for admission of eight petitioners to bail before arrest in a case under sections 148, 302/326/325/149, .P. P. C. registered against them on 23‑3‑1971 at Police Station Nankana Sahib, District Sheikhupura, but no compelling reasons have been shown for not approaching the learned Sessions Judge of the District in the first instance for this purpose. This practice of by‑passing the lower Courts is on the increase day by day and to encourage it would be setting an unhappy precedent. Mr. Manzur Qadir, C. J., as he then was, faced with a similar situation was pleased to dismiss the petition in Nasir‑ud Din Shah and another v. The State (P L D 1963 Lah. 516.) with the remarks that if this Court allows itself to be so used, it must be prepared to take over the function of considering the applications of all persons who think they are about to be arrested and running away from the police to take refuge here. In another case reported as Riaz Ahmad v. Toba Tek Singh Co‑operative Mortgage Bank (1968 P Cr. L J 1940 (1)) the petitioner was also directed to move the learned Sessions Judge in the first instance. I have had the benefit of seeing a recent order passed by my Lord, the Chief Justice in Muhammad Nawaz v. The State Cr. Misc. No. 8116 of 1970 in which he had dismissed in limine the petition for bail before arrest with a similar direction. Taking this view of the matter I am not inclined to entertain this petition and dismiss the same. The petitioner, if so advised, may approach the learned Sessions Judge for the purpose.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Arifwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.