Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SYED SHAMIM AHMED versus STATE


Section 1 561 A Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/468/471/34 Anti-Corruption Act (III of 1947), Section 5 (2) Fraudulent breach of trust, Counterfeit, use as a forged document The suspects were not designated as criminals in the FIR, and were initially produced as prosecution witnesses, but later through the interim challan, the defendants were involved in the case. Was made, but none of the prosecution witnesses had said anything against them. Eleven years had passed since the prosecution had no evidence against the accused through the High Court, but the prosecution had not yet examined more than five witnesses, and nothing had been recorded in the record against the accused, There will be excesses to allow the accused more. Trial against trial defendants endure trial in court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Faisalabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.