Find a Lawyer

HIDAYATULLAH versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Definition of Drug Arrest and Smuggling Evidence The benefit of the doubt was contradicted in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, both witnesses regarding the recovery and weight of allegedly recovered drugs were excise department and the complainant was the investigating officer. The prosecution's story was marked by a suspicion that the accused was acquitted of the benefit of the doubt and ordered to be released, under circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• ALI KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1907
• MOGHUL AND SONS through Partner v. NIB BANK LTD. 2012 CLD 1915
• Mst. AAISHA alias USHA v. BANJE RAM 2012 YLR 1918
• GOHRAM v. State 2012 MLD 1927
• Syed ALEEMUDDIN v. PAKISTAN AGRO-MECH INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2012 CLC 1928
• REHMAT ALI v. State 2012 YLR 1937
• DILDAR v. State 2012 MLD 1939
• Mst. FATIMA v. Mst. SHARIFA BAI 2012 CLC 1941

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Kotla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes