Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477 A / 34 and 109 of criminal breach of trust by a public servant, fraud, forgery, use of false documents and Declaring the accounts guaranteed to be forfeited, the accused was not shown the duty and duty in the grant of further investigation that the order of the bank certificate clearing salaries for depositing questions as joint supervisor was not disclosed by the first party itself. It was alleged that the accused misused the amount of pay orders. Except for the allegation that the accused, as joint supervisor, was responsible for depositing money at the Link Branch, no other corroborative evidence was available, and nothing was recovered from the accused and he was not the beneficiary of the embezzled money. Was recovered from the other co-accused and all the documents that were collected on his point of view could not possibly be tampered with, and the prime fee stated that the documents do not connect to the AC. Whatever material was collected by the prosecution, the accused, accused of resisting the bail taken by the complainant and the lawyer of the standing lawyer, was not linked to taking advantage of the misappropriated money. Further investigation was extended to the accused on bail, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
