Find a Lawyer

AMEER HAYAT versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Sindh Public Property (Termination of Expropriations) Act (XVIII of 2010), Section 8 (1) Excessive Selling Land Guarantees, Additional Investigation Grants for the Investigation of Plots and Boundary Valves Was going The accused were charged under Section 8 (1) of the Sindh Public Property Act, 2010, which was given a minimum sentence of one year which resulted in the prosecution of the accused under section 497 million p.c. Was not in the prohibited clause, and there was an unspecified delay of fifteen days in filing the FIR prosecution story which could not be released without any suspicion and further investigation was required. Was released on bail.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• ARBAB ZULFIQUAR ALI v. SPEAKER PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY, KARACHI 2012 MLD 1092
• JACOB'S BAKERY LIMITED v. ENGLISH BISCUIT MANUFACTURERS (PVT.) LIMITED 2012 CLD 1095
• RASHID v. State 2012 YLR 1099
• ABDUL SHAKOOR v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1102
• LIAQUAT KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 1107
• KASHMALY KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 1112
• SUPER TRADERS v. ALEEM KHAWAJA 2012 CLD 1115
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. State 2012 YLR 1116

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

when you need a advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes