Section 497 Police Rules, 1934, R26 32 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 22 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/353/148/149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XXX of 1965), S13 (e) Qatil Amad, attempt to commit an assault or criminal force, to prevent a public servant from performing his duties, unlawful armed assault, unlawful. The assembly, operations terrorism, unauthorized possession of arms, clearance of irregularities in the identification parade, the accused was kept at the police station for five days where the complainant (police officer) And the witnesses were deployed. When the complainant and the witnesses saw the accused, the president could not be excluded from the statement. The statement did not mention how the witness and the accused arrived at the court. Indicates that when the accused was presented face to face, the witnesses were directed to sit in the office, and the accused revealed that the witnesses had seen him in the police station, but the witnesses denied such accusations. Was done in the presence and even if his face was distorted you must have seen his clothes and shoes etc. Will be. Witnesses, who raised suspicion, made the identification parade after a delay of five days for which the prosecutor provided no explanation, no description of any of the dummies used during the identification parade. Provided that the sentence cannot be illegal and hollow. The identity parade suspect was admitted on bail, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
