ALI AKBAR versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY PUNJAB PUBLIC PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
R8 (3) (4) Notification No. DS (O&M) 5 3/2004 / Contract (MF) Government of Punjab, Article 10, 2010 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Prosecution Service Contractual Job Regular Applicants Was hired on a contract basis. In the prosecution service and their complaint was that in order to regularize their service, their cases should be referred to the Punjab Public Service Commission. The office bearers were in agreement and if they approved the Punjab Public Service Commission's eligibility and eligibility criteria, they should be regularized. And the authorities would not need to create any more posts for them. There was a difference between reference and recommendation as the latter could create some favor for the applicant but the reference did not create any right for which the Punjab Public Service Commission Applicants were ready and ready to meet all the needs of Posts administered by him and such matters are subject to notification number DS (O&M) 5 3/2004 / contr Act (MF) Government of Punjab, Dated, 10 11 2010 Applicants know about their positions. And gained experience and thus the new appointments could produce better results if the Punjab Public Service Commission High Court directed the authorities to hand over the matter. Applicant's request for transparency was allowed in the Punjab Public Service Commission to check their eligibility and eligibility as per the law regarding the Touchstone of Merit.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
