Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition for the wife in exchange for a dower by her husband and father or for the collection of Rs. 300,000 / which has been rejected by the present market value suit family. To take possession of a house given to his wife, to take possession of the house or to recover Rs. 10,000 / - as replacement, as its value is stated in the contract, the appellate court has awarded only Rs. Giving the grant for recovery of the husband's request that he does not have such a house, therefore, a decree can be passed against his father, Not to mention that in case of failure to give such a house to the wife, the husband will pay her Rs. 10,000, the price mentioned at the time of marriage was the market value of the marriage. In order to take possession of, or replace, such house, the decree was to be passed after determining the duty of the Family Court to recover an amount equal to its present market value. The market value of such a home, but not its absence, cannot be ruled out as ineffective or illegal because its value will be applied by the court during the proceedings. The wife can legally file a lawsuit against her father-in-law for the recovery of Dover, either on bail or guaranteed to pay, so he will be responsible for paying the bride because the bridegroom himself. The bridegroom's fingerprint was as the bride's "lawyer", therefore, the Family Court correctly sued her. Mr. Bunny passed Services
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
